Layout effects on sociogram perception

Huang, Weidong and Hong, Seok-Hee and Eades, Peter (2006) Layout effects on sociogram perception. In: Graph Drawing 13th International Symposium, GD 2005, September 12-14, 2005, Limerick, Ireland , pp. 262-273 (Official URL:

Full text not available from this repository.


This paper describes a within-subjects experiment in which we compare the relative effectiveness of five sociogram drawing conventions in communicating underlying network substance, based on user task performance and usability preference, in order to examine effects of different spatial layout formats on human sociogram perception. We also explore the impact of edge crossings, a widely accepted readability aesthetic. Subjective data were gathered based on the methodology of Purchase [2002]. Objective data were collected through an online system. We found that both edge crossings and conventions pose significant affects on user preference and task performance of finding groups, but either has little impact on the perception of actor status. On the other hand, the node positioning and angular solution might be more important in perceiving actor status. In visualising social networks, it is important to note that the techniques that are highly preferred by users do not necessarily always produce best task performance.

Item Type:Conference Paper
Additional Information:10.1007/11618058_24
Classifications:G Algorithms and Complexity > G.420 Crossings
M Methods > M.999 Others
ID Code:696

Repository Staff Only: item control page


Card, S., Mackinlay, J., and Shneiderman, B. (1999): Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.

Brandes, U., Raab, J. and Wagner. D. (2001): Exploratory Network Visualization: Simultaneous Display of Actor Status and Connections. Journal of Social Structure 2(4).

Brandes, U., Kenis, P. and Wagner, D. (2003): Communicating Centrality in Policy Network Drawings. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 9(2): 241-253.

Di Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R. and Tollis, I. (1998): Graph drawing: algorithms for the visualisation of graphs, Prentice Hall.

Freeman, L. (1999): Visualizing Social Groups. American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Section on Statistical Graphics, 47-54.

Ghoniem, M., Fekete, J. and Castagliola, P. (2004): A Comparison of the Readability of Graphs Using Node-Link and Matrix-Based Representations. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE InfoVis'04, Austin, TX. IEEE Press. pp. 17-24.

Huang, W., Hong, S., and Eades, P. (2005): Layout Effects: Comparison of Sociogram Drawing Conventions.$\sim$whua5569/ex/.

Katz, L. (1953): A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika, 18: 39-43.

Krackhardt, D. (1996): Social Networks and Liability of Newness for Managers. In C. L. Cooper and D. M. Rousseau (eds.), John Wiley Sons, Ltd. New York, NY. Trends in Organizational Behavior, Volume 3, pp. 159-173.

McGrath, C., Blythe, J. and Krackhardt, D. (1997): The effect of spatial arrangement on judgments and errors in interpreting graphs. Social Networks, 19(3):223-242.

McGrath, C., Blythe, J. and Krackhardt, D. (1996): Seeing Groups in Graph Layout. Connections, 19(2): 22-29.

McGrath, C., Krackhardt, D. and Blythe, J. (2003): Visualizing Complexity in Networks: Seeing Both the Forest and the Trees. Connections, 25(1): 37-47.

Moreno, J. L. (1953): Who shall survive: Foundations of Sociometry, Group Psychother-apy, and Sociodrama. Beacon House Inc.

Purchase, H., Allder, J. Carrington, D. (2002): Graph Layout Aesthetics UML Diagrams: User Preferences. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 6(3): 255-279.

Purchase, H., Cohen R., James M. (1995): Validating graph drawing aesthetics. Proceedings of the Graph Drawing Symposium, Passau, Germany (GD '95), 435-446, Springer-Verlag.

Purchase, H. (1997): Which aesthetic has the greatest effect on human understanding? Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Graph Drawing (GD '97), 248-261. Springer-Verlag.

Scott, J. (2000): Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Sage Publications, 2nd edition.