<mods:mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Complexity Results for Three-dimensional Orthogonal Graph Drawing</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Maurizio</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Patrignani</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>We introduce the 3SAT reduction framework which can be used to prove the NP-hardness of finding three-dimensional orthogonal drawings with specific constraints. We use it to show that finding a drawing of a graph whose edges have a fixed shape is NP-hard. Also, it is NP-hard finding a drawing of a graph with nodes at prescribed positions when a maximum of two bends per edge is allowed. We comment the impact of these results on the two open problems of determining whether a graph always admits a 3D orthogonal drawing with at most two bends per edge and of characterizing orthogonal shapes admitting a drawing without intersections.&#13;
    </mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">P.600.700 Orthogonal</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">G.999 Others</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">P.060 3D</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2006</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Springer</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Conference Paper</mods:genre></mods:mods>