  <eprint id="http://gdea.informatik.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/787" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
    <eprintid>787</eprintid>
    <rev_number>1</rev_number>
    <eprint_status>archive</eprint_status>
    <userid>2</userid>
    <dir>disk0/00/00/07/87</dir>
    <datestamp>2007-05-04</datestamp>
    <lastmod>2008-09-18 11:09:05</lastmod>
    <status_changed>2008-09-18 11:09:05</status_changed>
    <type>confpaper</type>
    <metadata_visibility>show</metadata_visibility>
    <item_issues_count>0</item_issues_count>
    <abstract>Bar k-visibility graphs are graphs admitting a representation in&#13;
which the vertices correspond to horizontal line segments, called&#13;
bars, and the edges correspond to vertical lines of sight which can&#13;
traverse up to k bars. These graphs were introduced by Dean et&#13;
al. [3] who conjectured that bar 1-visibility graphs have&#13;
thickness at most 2. We construct a bar 1-visibility graph having&#13;
thickness 3, disproving their conjecture. For a special case of bar&#13;
1-visibility graphs we present an algorithm partitioning the edges&#13;
into two plane graphs, showing that for this class the thickness is&#13;
indeed bounded by 2.</abstract>
    <altloc>
      <item>http://www.springer.com/dal/home/computer/lncs?SGWID=1-164-22-173721109-0</item>
    </altloc>
    <creators>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Massow</family>
          <given>Mareike</given>
        </name>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Felsner</family>
          <given>Stefan</given>
        </name>
      </item>
    </creators>
    <confdates>September 18-20, 2006</confdates>
    <conference>Graph Drawing</conference>
    <confloc>Karlsruhe, Germany</confloc>
    <editors>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Kaufmann</family>
          <given>Michael</given>
        </name>
        <id>Kaufmann, Michael</id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Wagner</family>
          <given>Dorothea</given>
        </name>
        <id>Wagner, Dorothea</id>
      </item>
    </editors>
    <ispublished>pub</ispublished>
    <pagerange>330-342</pagerange>
    <pubdom>FALSE</pubdom>
    <publisher>Springer</publisher>
    <refereed>FALSE</refereed>
    <referencetext>P. Bose, A. M. Dean, J. P. Hutchinson, and T. C. Shermer, On rectangle visibility graphs, in Proceedings of Graph Drawing '96, vol. 1353 of Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Springer, 1997, pp. 25-44.&#13;
F. J. Cobos, J. C. Dana, F. Hurtado, A. Marquez, and F. Mateos, On a visibility representation of graphs, in Proceedings of Graph Drawing '95, vol. 1027 of Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Springer, 1995, pp. 152-161.&#13;
A. M. Dean, W. Evans, E. Gethner, J. D. Laison, M. A. Safari, and W. T. Trotter, Bar k-visibility graphs. Manuscript, 2005.&#13;
A. M. Dean, W. Evans, E. Gethner, J. D. Laison, M. A. Safari, and W. T. Trotter, Bar k-visibility graphs: Bounds on the number of edges, chromatic number, and thickness, in Proceedings of Graph Drawing '05, vol. 3843 of Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Springer, 2006, pp. 73-82.&#13;
A. M. Dean, E. Gethner, and J. P. Hutchinson, Unit bar-visibility layouts of triangulated polygons., in Proceedings of Graph Drawing '04, vol. 3383 of Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Springer, 2005, pp. 111-121.&#13;
M. B. Dillencourt, D. Eppstein, and D. S. Hirschberg, Geometric thickness of complete graphs, J. Graph Algorithms  Applications, 4 (2000), pp. 5-17. Special issue for Graph Drawing '98.&#13;
D. Eppstein, Separating thickness from geometric thickness, in Proceedings of Graph Drawing '02, vol. 2528 of Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Springer, 2002, pp. 150-161.&#13;
S. G. Hartke, J. Vandenbussche, and P. Wenger, Further results on bar k-visibility graphs. Manuscript, November 2005.&#13;
J. Hutchinson, Arc- and circle-visibility graphs, Australas. Journal of Combin., 25 (2002), pp. 241-262.&#13;
J. P. Hutchinson, T. Shermer, and A. Vince, On representations of some thickness-two graphs, Comput. Geom. Theory Appl., 13 (1999), pp. 161-171.&#13;
A. Mansfield, Determining the thickness of graphs is NP-hard, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 9 (1983), pp. 9-23.&#13;
P. Mutzel, T. Odenthal, and M. Scharbrodt, The thickness of graphs: A survey, Graphs and Combinatorics, 14 (1998), pp. 59-73.&#13;
R. Tamassia and I. G. Tollis, A unified approach to visibility representations of planar graphs, Discrete Computational Geometry, 1 (1986), pp. 321-341.&#13;
S. K. Wismath, Characterizing bar line-of-sight graphs, in Proceedings of SCG  '85, ACM Press, 1985, pp. 147-152.</referencetext>
    <series>Lecture notes in Computer Science</series>
    <subjects>
      <item>P.900</item>
      <item>Z.999</item>
    </subjects>
    <title>Thickness of Bar 1-Visibility Graphs</title>
    <date_type>published</date_type>
    <date>2007</date>
    <full_text_status>none</full_text_status>
    <documents></documents>
  </eprint>
